Massey Commission Report

This schedule is an evoke from the Massey counsel Report (1951). In the year 1949, a counseling was raiment up to encourage the awareness in arts, social sciences, humanities and letters. The members of the agency were appointed by the federal government by commonly utilise to the Royal Commission on discipline Development in the Arts, garner and Sciences, appointed by the federal government with Vincent Massey, the chancellor of the University of Toronto as it head.The former(a) members of the commission included Arthur Surveyer, a civil engineer of Montreal Norman A.M. MacKenzie, president of the University of British Columbia the Most Rev Georges-Henri Lvesque, dean of the module of Social Sciences, Laval U and Hilda Neatby, professor of history at the University of Saskatchewan (Kallmann 2006 in The Canadian Encyclopedia).The document does offer some background chthonianstanding of the period it was produced in. The document concerns mainly the measure taken to remed y the lack of importance accorded to humanities and social studies in the curriculum, until then in the Canadian educational front. It is cognise from the previous chapters that the three Rs i.e. Reading Writing and arithmetic were given the utmost importance in the schools of Canada with sciences in normal, being neglected.The document explicates that the lack had been recognized even prior to the formation of the commission, in the geological formation of National Research Council for scientific studies. It seemed to have met with some success too, as indicated by the words that the success of National Research Council in encouragement of scientific studies offered an example that should perhaps be followed.The audience of the document was, obviously, the general public of Canada. The commission conducted research in four major cities of Canada, amid the months August 1949 and July 1950. Hundreds of petitions were received and heard in these four cities, and on the reason o f these briefs, experts were called in to prepare and include special studies that imparted more knowledge of the sciences.However, the Massy commission has rejected emulation of the National Research Council in setting up the National Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences. The document proceeded to give the reason for rejection too, as that the implied parallel between the two was misleading. Furthermore, it held the earlier National Research Council partly responsible for the current crisis, since the scientific studies were isolated into a separate ashes and also because they were subjected to too rigid techniques and methods of organization.The purpose of the document was to encourage studies in humanities and social sciences, by establishing flexible schemes of scholarships and grants which will aid the Canadian people to have scientific education and international exchanges especially under world bodies such as the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) and importantly closer contacts with France and swell Britain. It has to be remembered that during this period Quebec was given autonomy in heathen issues and thence was successful to a large extent in preserving the French identities and cultural awareness in its population, causing greater divide between itself and another(prenominal) English dominated areas of Canada.It must be said that Massey commission was for the most part successful in its intent and purpose, because most of the commissions recommendations were kill by the federal government in the subsequent years, despite enemy from the French provinces.Source Report Royal Commission on National Development in the Arts, Letters, and Sciences1949-1951. (Ottawa Kings Printer 1951)376-7 and Kallmann, Helmut The Canadian Encyclopedia. Massey Commission In The Encyclopedia of Music in Canada. Retrieved on 28 Oct 2006. http//www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm= trichloroethylene&Params= U1SEC838040