North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Program

atomic number 7 Koreas thermo thermo thermo atomic Weapons Program northeastward Korea has been in the forefront of the news as of late due in part to their nuclear Weapons chopine. Their efforts to dumbfound nuclear weapons has been an ongoing concern worldwide for some time now and tensions increased internationally after they conducted multiple tests in the recent years. What is conglutination Koreas real targetions in regard to their nuclear weapons class? In order for us to better understand northeast Koreas intentions, it is important to take a look at the timeline of their nuclear weapons political syllabuss progression and the negotiations known as the sextette party negotiation from this one can see that their intentions are based dour of their financial hardships and famine. sum Koreas attempt toward the encyclopedism of nuclear technology dates back as early as 1959. It was at this time that they signed a nuclear cooperation balance with the Soviet Union. T his arranging was aimed at the development of nuclear energy technology and by 1983 the wedlock Korean nuclear weapons program had been started (Ahn Web). In 1968, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NTP) was drafted by the USSR and the get together States and submitted for unify soils members to sign (Clemens Jr. Web). During the late 1980s North Korea had developed a state of stinting decline. This was due in part to the Soviet Unions economic and political changes, in which they had stop providing financial instigate to North Korea (Ahn Web). Do to this economic hardship North Korea decided to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1985 (North Korea Nuclear Timeline Web). However, between 1989 and 1991, it had become suspect that North Korea had been pursuing nuclear activities by extracting plutonium from its research reactor at Yongbyon. These suspected activities led to the first North Korean nuclear crisis which lasted from 19931994 (Ahn Web). The Internat ional Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was sent in to investigate what was believed to be unregistered nuclear waste dumping facilities, but North Korea was not cooperative with that request. However, when the West hold to suffice North Korea through economic aid and the lifting of economic sanctions it seemed that the crisis had come to an end (Ahn Web). Just another congresswoman of how North Korea intentions stem a troll the economic hardships that the coun act faces. In 1994, North Korea and the United States had come to an arrangement that North Korea would freeze and eventually point its old nuclear reactors. In exchange, they would be provided international aid to build two new light-water nuclear reactors (North Korea Nuclear Timeline Web). North Korea was in dire need of the spacious economic aid that the West would provide. During the 1990s North Koreas economic recession continued its downwardly spiral. By May of 1994, famine had become wide spread throughout the countr y. Many believed that the nuclear program was a tool used by North Koreas leader to divert the publics focus away from the economic problems and famine and refocus it on the United States and the IAEA (Ahn Web). This way the North Korean leader could point the blame for the hardships of the people toward one enemy and away from himself. InJanuary of 2003, North Korea withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) (North Korea Nuclear Timeline Web). This withdrawal is what lead tonegotiations that are known as the Six fellowship Talk. These talks involved sixstates, the United States, North Korea, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia.The purpose of these talks was to try to persuade North Korea to dismantle itsnuclear capabilities. It was believed that with the right amount of pressureand incentives that North Korea would cease their nuclear proliferationendeavors and be convert to dismantle its nuclear capabilities (Habib Web). North Korea was continuing to have economici ssues and their primary intent seemed to steam a expatiate the need for economic aid.These negotiations would take place from 2003 until 2009 and were comprised ofsix rounds of talks. In the first round of talks which occurred in August 2003,North Korea called for calibration of relations. They wanted a non-aggressionpact from the United States other than they would not dismantle their nuclearprogram. However, the United States declined this request (Liang Web). When thesecond rounds of talks began in February 2004, they appeared to be send off to agood start. North Korea put a deal on the tale to destroy its nuclear weaponsprogram if they could continue to develop peaceful nuclear energy programs.This was an agreeable compromise for China and Russia. However, the UnitedStates, Japan, and South Korea were not in agreement. They did not want NorthKorea to have access to nuclear capabilities (Liang Web). expression back on NorthKoreas past it is understandable that this would be a concern, because theyhave not kept deals that they had make in the past. For instance, when they hadsigned the nonproliferation treaty then secretly continued to employ nuclear weaponsdevelopment. In the third round of talks, in June of 2004, the United States steppedup with a proposal. In this proposal, they called for North Koreas todismantle its nuclear program. It stated that North Korea would be given athree calendar month period to prepare to freeze its program, after which they would berequired to provide record of activities proving that activities had stoppedand that the program had been dismantled (Liang Web). This proposal did not goanywhere.Thefourth round of talks did not get off to a good start. The United StatesPresidential election put negotiations on hold for a objet dart followed by NorthKorea state that they were now in possession of nuclear weapons. North Koreathen declared that they were no longer interested in continuing the six partytalks. But, they would e ventually be convinced to return to negotiations whenthe US agreed to recognized them as a sovereign state. The turning point forNorth Korea to rejoin the talks would be when the US stated that they did nothave any intentions of invading North Korea (Liang Web). On September 19, 2005,there appeared to be headway on the negotiations front with North Koreasagreement to abandon their quest for nuclear weapons program and allow the IAEAback in for inspections in exchange for the normalization of relations with theUS and Japan as well as economic aid (Bajoria Web). Again, we see that economicaid has made its appearance once again. However, North Korea wanted to continuetheir nuclear energy program. They agreed to rejoin the NPT, as well as to allowinspections from the IAEA (Liang Web). Bythe time the fifth rounds of talks began, in November of 2005, tensions werehigh and the climate of negotiations had deteriorated. The US had placed sanctionsagainst North Korea and the froze the assets the state held in the Banco DeltaAsia of Macau (Liang Web). North Korea had again boycotted the six party talks.They decided to do a show of power in an attempt to send a to the US tounfreeze North Koreas assets. This is when North Korea begun to conductingmissile and nuclear testing (Habib Web). The United Nation passed resolution1718 in October of 2006 on North Korea calling for an immediate stop to theirtesting and the nuclear program to be abandoned. They urged North Korea toreturn to the six party talks. Talks resumed in February 2007 and thereappeared to be an agreement amongst the six parties. North Korea woulddismantle its nuclear program and the Us and Japan would to work towardnormalization with North Korea. The agreement included the that all partieswould work toward providing north Korea with the acquisition of heavy fuel(Liang Web).Thesixth round of talks did not start off well. The US had not released the fundsin the Banco Delta Asia of Macau and the North Korean deleg ate walked out ofnegotiations. Although talks would continue in September and October of 2007after the IAEA confirmed that the nuclear installment at Yongbyon and the partiescontinued their talks about supplying heavy oil (Liang Web). Just as talks werelooking like there was progress they began to falter yet again. North Korea wasnot happy with samples world collected at their Yongbyon facility and claimed thatno such agreement had been made. In April 2009, North Korea test launched amodified Taepo Dong-2 three-stage rocket. An obvious disregard to theagreements made in other rounds of talks. On April 14th 2009, NorthKorea announced that they would no longer be part of the six party talks andthat any agreement that had been made in previous talks were null and void.Many have called for the talks to continue, but to no advantage (Liang Web). on that pointseems to be a stalemate at this time. We can see that North Korea has nointentions to dismantle their Nuclear weapons program a ny time soon. For themit is their bargaining chip. The use of fear of attack as a means of gettingwhat they want, what they need. Itis apparent that North Korea has been in search of Nuclear technology for manyyears. Their motives crapper this search come to light when one takes a look atthe history behind it. A deeper look into time line of North Koreas nuclearweapons and the event that occurred during the six party talks, shows thatNorth Koreas declining economic situation has been a key player in their questfor nuclear weapons capabilities. There desperate need for economic aid has ledthem toward a road where they believe the fear of a nuclear attack is the onlyway for them to obtain the much needed assistance that they need.WorksCitedAhn, Mun Suk. WhatIs the sink Cause of the North Korean Nuclear Program?. Asian AffairsAn American Review, vol. 38, no. 4, Oct. 2011, pp. 175-187. EBSCOhost,inside10.1080/00927678.2011.604287.Bajoria,Jayshree, and Beina Xu. The Six Party Talks on North Koreas Nuclear Program.Council on extraneous Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, 30 Sept.2013, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/six-party-talks-north-koreas-nuclear-program.Habib, Benjamin.North Koreas Nuclear Weapons Programme and the Maintenance of the SongunSystem. Pacific Review, vol. 24, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 43-64.EBSCOhost, doi10.1080/09512748.2011.554992.Clemens Jr., Walter C.North Koreas hobby for Nuclear Weapons New Historical Evidence. Journalof East Asian Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, Jan-Apr2010, pp. 127-154. EBSCOhost,ccco.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http//search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true(p)&db=a9h&AN=48647386&site=ehost-live&scope=site.North Korea Nuclear TimelineFast Facts. CNN, Cable News Network, 4 Sept. 2017,www.cnn.com/2013/10/29/world/asia/north-korea-nuclear-timelinefast-facts/index.html.Liang, Xiaodon. FactSheets & Briefs. The Six-Party Talks at a Glance, Arms Control Association,18 July 2017, www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/6partytalks.