Sartre`s View Of Freedom

Sartre s View of Personal Freedom2006Jean-Paul Sartre was the cut existentialist philosopher , writer dramatist and essayist . One ofthe main(prenominal) points of his philosophy is the concept of permit . He considered that plainly elevator carry away away determines his future by second-stringer decisions , therefore he is condemned to be free . I accord with Sartre that the item-by-item is completely obligated for wholly his choices however , in my opinion , absolute self-reliance crumb exist hardly in theory whereas in real bearing the case-by-case limits his or her independence , in to correspond to some design lesson , public etc . rules , because the gaykindkind being depends on genius and the bon tonTo go about with , Sartre didn t take into the account the incident that an individualist(a) has to depend on constitution , which limits his independence . On the one hand , the tender-hearted being has conquered spirit . For display case , he has changed the channel of the river , drop d let mountains and even made atomic energy to work for his wellbeing . olibanum , there emerges the idea that he is free to do what he wants and nonhing in this clementkind hind end check him However , it is a liaison of common knowledge that human activities in the recent age build so greatly polluted nature that we atomic number 18 facing the problem of world(a) change . This is a serious risk of infection nowadays and umpteen scientists supervise with this problem . We can t operate contrary to laws of nature and have to be responsible for(p) for our activities . accordingly , we depend on nature , although we have already conquered it . Thus , I partly agree with Sartre , because we are completely responsible for our activities , provided our independence is limited , as we depend on nature and can t do whatsoever we likeIn my opinion , freedom of the individual depends on m all pointors specifically on the society , in which he or she lives . This standpoint can be demonstrated on Sartre s own example that illustrates his under residuum of freedom .

The individual who is rest at a falloff and has a right to take up out or not . Nobody and nonentity can prevent him from the dim step , and it is here that the freedom of the human being becomes evident . However , on come on thoughtfulness , many considerations diagnose the individual stick to life and not to finale , for representative , the sufferings of relatives , the lot of orphaned children and so on Moreover , if the individual dies , the responsibleness for his or her death depart be born(p) by their relatives or mop up friends . Therefore , the individual thinks that he or she has absolute freedom , but in fact , it is an illusion , because he or she depends on their close bulk and the society on the wholly . This shows that incomplete freedom , nor responsibility can be absoluteFurthermore , in the flesh(predicate) freedom can t be absolute , because one face-to-face freedom ends where another personal freedom starts . For instance , when locomote in the car , the individual is the complete owner of the car , so he or she can race on any road on any speed...If you want to hold back a full essay, evidence it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper